Some people believe that increasing tax on various industries will reduce pollution whereas others believe that there are better alternative ways. discuss both the view and give your opinion.

The significance of industries were always debatable which have now become more controversial with many people believe that these are beneficial while others disagree. In my opinion, the later proposition in more logical. However, a number of individuals feel that government should fixe higher taxes on different factories to remove pollution, others assume that there are fine solutions instead of rising vat. Thin essay will elaborate attributing this trend with perspective views in the looming paragraphs. To begin with, nowadays a huge number of industries are discharging carbon dioxides in air and river, which create air and water pollution as well as sound pollution. Moreover, if governments take a large number of taxes from companies, it will assist to consume environment pollution through closing some factories. Duse to the fact that small industries would be unbaled to show interest manufacturing goods and authorities can be shut down those companies. However, if most of the less important factories will have closed, the surrounding area will look greener and people also take breath in fresh air. On the other hand, when a large number of companies will close, many young individuals will become unemployment and effect on economic development in the world. Furthermore, if authorities move all industries to village from city center, it cannot be spoiled income sources of many poor and middle-class people. For example, a survey done by 'BBC News’ in Bangladesh, some of th...

Some individuals trust that if governments escalate the taxes on several factories, the pollution of industries will lower significantly. In contrast, numerous people emphasize that there are also other types of methods to lessen pollution. Firstly, this essay will look at posing taxes on industries then the essay will provide alternative ways to cut pollution. Most industrial companies cause to worsen the environment through their pollution and the majority of politicians strongly suggest that all industries should pay more than their normal taxation because of their pollution. Thus, they attempt to purchase more economic technologies which are not harmful to the environment. For instance, the way of German plants for reducing pollution is more effective and their method is being used by other countries such as India and Singapore. Pollution is a global problem and an abundance of environmentalists have been demanding that gigantic space agencies such as NASA and Space X need to cease to make effort to reach other planets and rockets are damaging the ozone layer. In addition, if they stop it, companies do not have to overpay charges. Furthermore, I strongly recommend that when we create more channels and artificial islands, there will be no need to raise the taxes and the effect of pollution will decrease rapidly on account of deeply caring for nature. In conclusion, the most harmless way to reduce pollution is to replace the old technological tools by providing cutting-e...

Hi, I hope I can get some feedback about the following essay. Thank you for reading it. . Some people believe that increasing tax on various industries will reduce pollution whereas others believe that there are better alternative ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. . It was believed by some people that raising tax on many industries will tackle the problem of pollution whilst others reckon that there are more effective alternatives to tax raising. Considering the reasons of each side, it may be best, in my opinion, to combine a variety of methods rather than depend solely on one way. Those agreeing to put an increase on tax believe that the movement will force many companies and corporations to reconsider their current production procedures. Consequently, they will be expected to pick up a more environmentally-friendly tactic in order to survive in the business world. On the other hand, it is also true that besides raising taxes, other alternatives can also be implemented to deal with pollution. Governments and organizations can, for example, initiate a project encouraging people to use public transport more often, or to trade ole and unused things such as cans, bottles, or clothes for money and other minor privileges. As both sides have their own plausible explanation to stand their ground, the most practical approach, it seems, is to combine the best of each party together. Surely, redirecting production activities of significant and influential industries w...

Americas+1 212 318 2000 EMEA+44 20 7330 7500 Asia Pacific+65 6212 1000 • Company • • • • • • • • • Communications • • Follow • • • • • • Products • • • • • Industry Products • • • • • Media • • • • • • • • • • Media Services • • • Company • • • • • • • • • Communications • • Follow • • • • • • Products • • • • • Industry Products • • • • • • Media • • Technology • • • • Businessweek • • • • Media Services • • • Bloomberg • 00:00 >> WE ARE KICKING YOU OFF TO THE CLOSING BELL. A MIXED DAY OF TRADING WITH A LOT OF ANTICIPATION BEFORE NEXT WEEK. NO DATA TO REACT OFF OF TODAY. YOU ARE STILL LOOKING AT A RALLY ON THE S & P 500. BIG TECH ALSO RALLYING. THIS IS THE SEVENTH WEEK OF GAINS FOR THE NASDAQ 100. >> IT IS UP ABOUT 35% SINCE THE NOVEMBER LOWS. >> THIS IS SO FAR THE LET LONGEST WEEKLY RISING STREAK SINCE JULY 2021. KATIE: AT THE SAME TIME YOU ARE SEEING A SELLOFF IN THE TREASURY MARKET. WHAT IS THE FED GOING TO DO NEXT WEEK? SCARLET: SKIP? HAWKISH HOLD IS THE TERM EVERYONE IS USING. NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT HAWKISH -- DOVISH PAUSE. THERE'S GOING TO BE A SERIES OF LIVE AUCTIONS NEXT WEEK. THE TURKISH LIRA IS SOMETHING WE WILL CONTINUE TO LOOK AT. HERE IS THE THING THAT HAPPENED THIS WEEK. THE S & P 500 FINALLY ENTERED A BULL MARKET. IT DID SO ON VERY NARROW BREATH. KATIE: WHETHER OR NOT THAT'S AN ISSUE IS A DISCUSSION I'VE BEEN HAVING AND I IMAGINE WE WILL HAVE TODAY. IF YOU LOOK AT THE NUMBERS, DOES IT MATTER? SCARLET: THEN THE ETERNAL QUESTION, IS THE FED DONE HIKING? A LO...

Submitted by l2gamecenter on Sun Aug 14 2022 Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. Could you imagine the world without advertising? Which products you have bought by advertising? Obviously, people become aware about products by influence of advertising. In addition, power of advertising made large amount of sales in popular consumer goods. In fact, some of those products are not vital to the shoppers but they are sold because of impacting the power of advertising. I suppose, advertising has been played intensively in selling consumer goods. In order to advertising could depict the products as different by exaggeration. Furthermore, advertising could make the sense of needing in shoppers. • It is affirmed by the majority of movies critiques that cruel and vicious shows, which have a wide reputation in our societies, deplorably and seriously affect our communities citizens` mindset. Nevertheless, others deem that the more violence in media exist, the more pleasure it will fetch. In my perspective, I consent with the first opinion, and the essay will illustrate that in the upcoming paragraphs. • In the last 20 years, the assessment of students has undergone major transformation. Many educational institutions no ...

Some people believe that to reduce industrial pollution a tax should be imposed on companies, while others believe that different measures should be taken to solve the problem. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Nowadays, with the increase, the industry in the world has risen the pollution in every nation started heavy-duty on companies. Although, there are other things that take steps to solve the trouble by which I will discuss both views in subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, rising industrial in the economy day by day has a direct impact on nature by which they destroy air, water and ground so that a reason to control the growth of industries for the save planets. Also, it creates a huge amount of carbon. In such a manner Government should impose a tax to implement pollution control. For example, America is a country that imposes heavier taxes on corporations to control pollution. However, it is easier to reduce the However, some people suggest that not only is increasing the taxes is sufficient to create awareness, it also works as well as it is important to spread the awareness in public. It also highly works. In paper and plastic industries are more creating pollution rather than others. Additionally, if people are aware of their environment, they cannot buy plastic items, so indirectly, the industry will grow less automatically pollution will be under control.

Pollution has become the cause of concern for everyone. It is said that imposing taxes on highly polluting factories is pertinent. But some people believe that several other measures can be taken to diminish pollution. However, the problem of pollution is soo severe that, as per my opinion, all possible strategies should be adopted to contain it. Industries and factories are considered as the biggest air polluters. All production units use tonnes of coal and gallons of petrol and diesel for running their machinery; these fossil fuels emanate several noxious gases which are injurious for the health of human and the environment. The more fossil fuel is used, the more will be the concentration of harmful gases in the environment. A report, for instance, revealed in the United Nation Conference on Climate Change showed that since the industrial revolution in 1850, the temperature on the earth is increased by 2-degree Celsius because of green house gases. Therefore, inflicting higher taxes or cesses on industries will increase the government’s revenue that can be used to diminish the pollution. In addition to the above measure, other strategies should also be adopted to alleviate pollution. As cars and other motor vehicles are the second most polluter of the environment, its use requires to be discouraged. The state should increase the public transportation system so that people do not use their vehicles. Also, water pollution can be decreased if the sewage water is treated bef...

GT Writing Task 2 / Essay Sample # 262 You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Some people think that the most effective way to reduce industrial pollution is to tax the companies which cause them. Others think that there are better ways to do so. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Model Answer: Many people opine that imposing the carbon tax is the most useful approach to decrease industrial pollutions. Yet others believe there are other better measures to curb this issue. This essay will discuss both viewpoints before venturing an opinion. The advocates of levying tax argue that it reduces pollution in two ways. First, the increased tax burden will motivate businesses to switch to sustainable manufacturing systems so as to remain competitive in the market. For instance, they can use clean energy such as wind energy, solar energy, and hydro-powered sources. Second, it will also raise the production cost of goods. This, in turn, will cut down consumption and hence pollution. Thus, introducing tax can play an effective role in reducing industrial pollution. The opponents of taxing, on the other hand, claim that there are far better solutions to the problem. One of the most effective ways to tackle industrial pollution is source controlling. Adopting green technology, providing employees with effi...