Method hiding factor is defined as

Page/Link: Page URL: HTML link: Citations: • MLA style: "A method for calculating acknowledged project effort using a quality index.." The Free Library. 2007 Slovenian Society Informatika 15 Jun. 2023 • Chicago style: The Free Library. S.v. A method for calculating acknowledged project effort using a quality index.." Retrieved Jun 15 2023 from • APA style: A method for calculating acknowledged project effort using a quality index.. (n.d.) >The Free Library. (2014). Retrieved Jun 15 2023 from Povzetek: V prispevku je analizrana korelacija med kakovostjo programske kode in produktivnostjo. Keywords: project effort, product metrics, software size, function points, object-oriented metrics 1 Introduction Software size is an elementary measure often used to calculate project effort, costs, productivity and duration. In practice, the actual effort measured during the project development time could be significantly different although the estimated project size is the same. The effort is influenced by several factors like the complexity of the solution, development team size, development platform, etc. In this research, the focus is on the code quality that could as well influence the project total effort. The quality is defined as the totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs. [10]. In terms of measures, it is a collection of metrics that cover categories like functional correctness, maintainabilit...

Project Metrics Help - MOOD and MOOD2 metrics MOOD and MOOD2 metrics The MOOD metrics, defined by Fernando Brito e Abreu, are designed to provide a summary of the overall quality of an object-oriented project. The original MOOD metrics suite consists of 6 metrics. The MOOD2 metrics were added later. These metrics are useful for projects with heavy use of object-oriented programming. If your project relies mostly on standard modules and classic .frm files, the object-oriented metrics are not a good choice for you, even if your project contains some classes. The MOOD/MOOD2 metrics are available at the project level. They describe the entire project, not an individual class. See also MOOD/MOOD2 definitions When counting the MOOD/MOOD2 metrics, Project Analyzer uses the following definitions. Class Classic VB: .cls or .ctl file VB.NET: Class..End Class Method (operation) Classic VB: A sub, function or property procedure. VB.NET: A sub, function, property accessor or operator. Attribute (variable) Classic VB: A variable or array defined in the declarations section of a class. VB.NET: A class-level variable or array. It can be defined Shared or not. Please notice that MOOD attributes have nothing to do with the .NET . Original MOOD metrics suite The original MOOD metrics suite includes 6 metrics: MHF, AHF, MIF, AIF, PF and CF. MHF Method Hiding Factor. AHF Attribute Hiding Factor. Method and attribute hiding factor measure how variables and methods are encapsulated in a class. V...

Closed 10 years ago. Possible Duplicate: I am wondering how method hiding could be useful in c# ? If you dive into the concept ,you can find that method hiding is something confusing and drives us to spaghetti code style.There are some reasons for that : 1- If you need a fresh method in your Derived class you can define a new method with a new name in your derived class. 2-In a polymorphic manner usage when you use upcasting, the expected behavior would not be achieved and this could be confusing. (Specially this strange behavior could be so apparent and obvious if the Base class and the Derived Class were in the different libraries and you want to have a polymorphic usage of them in somewhere in your code) class Base Such a behavior could be confusing, but If we used " virtual" in " Base" and " override" in " Derived" (I mean a polymorphic usage) the output was: "I am Derived Class". and this output is what that I think the most of us expected. In other words I believe that in a hierarchy, most of developers expected for overridden methods in a derived class Not New methods that wanna hide the base class implementation. I cant understand why such a bad thing that has no advantages there is in c# language? at least I want to know what is the best usages of method hiding in c# ? thank you for your help If you need a fresh method in your Derived class you can define a new method with a new name in your derived class Not always. Consider the case where you derive a class tha...